ORANJESTAD — People with limited financial resources appear to be among the groups most vulnerable to risky gambling behavior in Aruba. A scientific study reveals that 43% of gamblers earning a net monthly income of up to Afl. 1,000 show characteristics associated with moderate- or high-risk gambling. This compares with just 18% among gamblers earning Afl. 3,001 or more per month. The income gap is one of the most significant findings of the Onderzoek Kansspeldeelname Aruba study, conducted by RE-Quest Research & Consultancy.
ONE IN FOUR GAMBLERS AT ELEVATED RISK
Researchers used the internationally recognized Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) to assess gambling-related risks. Among respondents who had gambled during the previous year and had valid assessment results, 20% were classified as moderate-risk gamblers and 5% as high-risk gamblers. Together, these groups account for approximately one in four gamblers assessed. Another 16% were classified as low-risk, while 59% showed no signs of problematic gambling according to the assessment tool. Researchers emphasize that these classifications indicate risk levels, not clinical diagnoses of gambling addiction.
MEN, YOUNG ADULTS AND SENIORS
The study also identified differences across demographic groups. Male gamblers were more frequently classified in the moderate- and high-risk categories than female gamblers. By age, the highest proportions were found among gamblers aged 18–39 and those aged 65 and older. These findings suggest that both younger adults and seniors deserve particular attention in gambling prevention programs.
LOW INCOME AND FINANCIAL VULNERABILITY
The difference between lower- and higher-income gamblers is particularly relevant for Aruba. Although the study identifies an association between income and gambling risk, it does not establish that financial hardship directly causes gambling addiction. Nor does it suggest that everyone with a low income who gambles has a gambling problem. Researchers caution that a considerable proportion of gamblers did not provide valid income information, meaning the findings should be interpreted carefully. Nevertheless, the identified pattern provides an important consideration for government policy, particularly in protecting financially vulnerable households. The report recommends targeted prevention programs and greater emphasis on financial education. Click HERE for the complete report.